Despite the horrifying destructive power of nuclear weapons, countries not only did not cease to produce them, but on the contrary, started to seek ways of gaining such weapons of mass destruction. As a result, in the 21st century, the world is sitting on a huge nuclear bomb that can be armed at any moment. Respectively, the question arises: Governments avoid using nuclear warheads in conflicts against their opponents because of the danger that such weapons could be used against themselves in response.
From this perspective, it does no matter anymore which country produced the first nuclear warhead. Nowadays, besides the U. Considering the intense relationships between these participators in geopolitical processes, possessing nuclear weapons can be seen as a reasonable counter-measure against possible violent demarches from them.
At the same time, it is unclear why governments strive to produce and maintain such vast amounts of nuclear warheads. Though the idea of storing such numbers of warheads is justified by the necessity to protect said countries and their allies, it still does not make real sense.
Considering the destructive power of weapons produced today, as well as the fact that nuclear warheads are not meant to be used for assault, it seems that 10 times lower amounts would be enough for the proclaimed goals. This would relieve the economy, and besides, prove the peaceful intentions of all countries that own weapons of mass destruction.
In the context of the worldwide proclaimed struggle with terrorism, the issue of possessing nuclear weapons should be also analyzed in terms of the possibility of terrorists gaining access to such weapons. In the world where defense systems are operated through computer systems, physical control over warheads is not necessary; theoretically, a skilled hacker could break defense systems of a country of their choice, and gain advantage over opponents Shmeller.
And though chances of this are low, it still does not speak in favor of nuclear weapons. On the contrary, it becomes yet another factor of anxiety. Nuclear weapons are perhaps the most powerful means of warfare in the modern world. On one side, nuclear weapons help to maintain the geopolitical balance of powers, and act as a guarantee and preventive measure of possible assaults. On the other hand, a set of factors proves that nuclear weapons are not worth the expenses of their maintenance as well as risks connected to their possession.
Among these factors, a huge economical burden and a chance of terrorists seizing control over them seem to be the most obvious. In the beginning of World War II, the scientists of the world recognized the possibility of nuclear warfare during the war.
The rumor of nuclear warfare turned into a real race. Scientists from the United States, Germany, Russia, and many other countries began to research, make, and test nuclear bombs.
The operations were kept secret, but the United States broke the tension in The resulting explosions killed hundreds of thousands of civilians and ended the Pacific War. However, the nuclear arms race did not stop after World War II, and the Soviet Union became increasingly involved in the arms race. Meanwhile, nuclear weapons continued to grow in power and sophistication.
The United States tested the first hydrogen bomb, a nuclear bomb that used nuclear fusion, which had such great power. The Russians also created their own hydrogen bomb, and the rest of the world continued to take interest in nuclear weapons.
Fear sparked throughout the world of the possibility of the release of any of these hydrogen bombs "Nuclear Fusion". Even countries like North Korea began to gain a supply of nuclear weapons. Scientists who continue to study the nuclear weapons have recognized the destruction that could happen if there were a nuclear war. The reality of the situation is that the supply of nuclear weapons throughout the world has the power to obliterate the entire planet.
Refutation Many people support nuclear weapons because of their effective function as deterrents and their ability to preserve the balance and order in the world.
The main defense for nuclear weapons comes from the idea that nuclear weapons are acting as deterrents. The destructive force of nuclear weapons really has kept the nations of the world at bay. Countries will now think twice before attacking the United States, Russia, or any other country with a supply of nuclear weapons. Even countries with a supply of nuclear weapons do not want to engage in nuclear war; not because they will lose, but because of the destruction that each country would have to face to gain victory.
This treaty continued to limit the amount of nuclear warheads that each nation could have. However, researchers believe that a shift to a world without nuclear weapons would cause too much damage.
The resulting mentality of the countries would be back to that of pre-World War II times. Countries would begin to wage war annually, and casualties would begin to pile up.
The countries of the world will no longer have to worry about the threat of nuclear weapons and will begin annual onslaughts with other weaponry. The United States cannot force nuclear deterrence on the world. If the United States moves into nuclear disarmament, certain countries will refuse to give up their nuclear weapons and may hide supplies of nuclear weapons in secret locations.
The result is that the tables will turn on the United States. The United States will be disarmed, but other countries will be effectively armed with nuclear weapons.
The United States and the rest of the world would become subject to these nuclear countries. The argument that many people are giving is that removing nuclear weapons is not only a bad idea, but is also impossible.
There is no absolute way to make the rest of the world completely give up nuclear weapons. Nuclear disarmament has cost the world a significant amount of money. Policies towards nuclear disarmament have been continuously draining funds.
This war cost the United States a great deal of money and created great amounts of conflict and casualties. Now, the world is focusing on the activities of North Korea and even more on Iraq. If these countries began to build up a supply of nuclear weapons, the result would be horrific because of the economic struggle the countries would go through before and after creating the weapons.
However, other researchers in the world support nuclear disarmament and want an end to the fear in the world of nuclear arms. Confirmation A great number of people want the world to move to nuclear disarmament. People in the world have been agonizing and fearing the possibility of nuclear war or a simple nuclear attack. The people of the world recognize the power of nuclear weapons to destroy and obliterate.
After the September 11 attacks, many people recognized how vulnerable any country is to attack. The fear is that a nuclear bomb could strike at any time and create a great number of casualties. The United States has about 4, nuclear warheads, while the Russians have about 3, What could happen if these warheads were accidently unleashed?
If the world does not remove nuclear arms now, the result will be the destruction of the planet. While the possibility of nuclear warfare grows and countries debate about nuclear disarmament, some people wonder what could happen if nuclear weapons ended up in the wrong hands. Certain researchers believe that international terrorism is moving to utilize nuclear weapons to cause further destruction. The big problem is that not much is being done to prevent the terrorists from getting a nuclear bomb.
The reality is that it is not very difficult to make a nuclear bomb if a person has the right materials. A good amount of uranium can cause a nuclear explosion very easily. If a terrorist has separated uranium, it is actually a simple job to set off a nuclear explosion. The amount of materials like plutonium and uranium that is needed is very small. Additionally, it is not very difficult to get the materials because the materials are not being properly guarded.
Free nuclear weapons papers, essays, and research papers.
Essay: Nuclear Weapons. In its attempts to harness the power of the atom, mankind has itself in the possession of weapons with unbelievable, destructive power. Nations now have the ability to destroy entire cities from hundreds of miles away, in only minutes. These weapons are nuclear weapons.
Should every country have the right to possess nuclear weapons? On the 6th November , a United States bomber flew towards the Japanese city of Hiroshima. Should every country have the right to possess nuclear weapons? On the 6th November , a United States bomber flew towards the Japanese city of Hiroshima. The only cargo aboard that B bomber was an atomic bomb – ironically nicknamed “Little Boy” .
Sample essay on Nuclear Weapons, free essay on Nuclear Weapons, example essay on Nuclear Weapons. At csample.ml you can order a custom written essay, term paper or . The world has witnessed only two cases of the use of nuclear weapons as an argument in war: when in the United States dropped Fat Man and Little Boy onto Japanese cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki.